Login

Stablecoins

Stablecoins Won

Опубликовано: September 8, 2026 в 4:05 am

Автор:

Категории: Stablecoins

Тэги: ,,,

The argument is over.

Stablecoins have won, so what next?

Visa settles in USDC. Stripe bought a stablecoin infrastructure company. PayPal issued its own. The Central Bank of Nigeria opened a sandbox for companies whose products are tied to payments and financial infrastructure; even China’s Notice No. 42, tightening control over cryptocurrencies and yuan-pegged stablecoins, is not an argument that the technology does not work. It is an argument that it works too well to be left alone.

Nobody serious now claims stablecoins will not be payment infrastructure. That question closed sometime in the last two years while everyone was still debating it.

Which means the interesting phase is finished and the phase that decides who actually wins has started.

What the next decade of work actually is:

1. Licensing, in jurisdiction after jurisdiction: Dozens of licences, each with its own capital requirement, its own supervisor, its own inspection, its own renewal.

2. Liquidity management: Holding local currency in markets before customers ask for it, funding those positions, carrying overnight risk, rebalancing.

3. Reconciliation and reporting: The unglamorous machinery that turns a movement of value into a document an auditor accepts. Nobody has ever been excited about a settlement report. Customers refuse to switch away from good ones.

4. Dispute handling, tax treatment, sanctions screening, beneficiary validation, holiday calendars: All of it necessary. None of it is interesting.

The uncomfortable implication:

If the technology is commoditised and the value sits in licences and liquidity, then the natural winners are not exactly crypto-native.

They are institutions with balance sheets, regulatory relationships and treasury functions, which is to say the incumbents, or new entrants willing to become structurally similar to incumbents.

This is the part crypto builders tend to resist, because the whole appeal was routing around exactly those institutions. But look at what the market is actually paying for – the ability to settle into a Kenyan mobile money wallet on a Sunday, legally, with a document at the end.

That capability is made of licences, local partnerships, capital and operational discipline. It is not made of code, and it cannot be forked.

If you are building: stop optimising the part that already works. The differentiated work is in licences you do not have yet, liquidity you have not funded, and reporting nobody wants to build.

If you are buying: evaluate providers on the boring things. What do they hold, where are they licensed, what does their success rate do at month end, what does their settlement report contain. The demo will be fast. Everyone’s demo is fast now.

We are building on the assumption that the exciting phase is over and the durable businesses will be the ones that did the tedious work early.

We’re doing the tedious work at Zynta.

Nigeria Chose Stablecoins

Опубликовано: August 19, 2026 в 9:41 pm

Автор:

Категории: Stablecoins

Тэги: ,,,

Why Nigeria Is Ground Zero for Stablecoin Payments

In February 2021, the Central Bank of Nigeria sent a directive to every commercial bank in the country.

“Close all accounts associated with cryptocurrency transactions, effective immediately.”

The CBN framed it as a regulatory measure. What they probably didn’t expect was what happened next: absolutely nothing slowed down.

Not adoption, not volume, not the number of Nigerians moving money through digital asset channels. If anything, those numbers went up, the P2P market exploded, exchanges migrated offshore, and Nigerians found routes around the banking system and kept moving.

By late 2023, the CBN reversed itself. By early 2025, Nigeria’s SEC had approved the country’s first official stablecoin, the Compliant Nigerian Naira Stablecoin, backed 1:1 by naira reserves. And by June 2026, the IMF was publishing a formal report acknowledging what everyone in Nigerian fintech had known for years: stablecoins had become “a meaningful cross-border payments channel” for the country.

You don’t ban something and then publish an IMF paper validating it unless the demand was always real, always large, and never going away.

Nigeria’s stablecoin dominance is the product of a specific collision between three factors:

1. The currency reality: The naira fell from roughly 460 per dollar in early 2023 to over 1,500 at its worst point. People who held savings in naira through that period lost more than half their dollar-equivalent wealth without spending a single note. Converting to USDT was the rational behaviour of anyone who understood what was happening to the currency they were supposed to trust.

2. The FX access problem: Nigeria processed an estimated $26 billion in stablecoin transaction volume in 2024 primarily for import/export financing, despite restrictive official policies. Businesses that needed foreign currency to pay international suppliers couldn’t always access it through the formal banking system at a workable rate. The FX queue at a Nigerian bank could take weeks. Buying USDT on a local exchange took minutes.

3. The remittance cost: Sending $200 to sub-Saharan Africa through traditional channels costs around 9% on average. Stablecoin remittances cost a fraction of that. For Nigerian diaspora sending money home regularly, a population in the millions, sending billions per year, that cost difference is meaningful every single month.

Put these factors together in a country of 220 million people with high smartphone penetration, a young tech-literate population, and a thriving informal economy, and you get the largest stablecoin market on the continent, almost by necessity.

Nigeria proved that demand for stablecoins doesn’t need permission.
What it needs now is compliant settlement, reliable liquidity, and local delivery into bank accounts and mobile wallets.

That’s where the next generation of payment infra begins, and that’s exactly where we’re building at Zynta.